ArticleInternational journal of hematology2022
A retrospective single-center analysis of G-CSF-mobilized donor lymphocyte infusion in hematologic malignancies after unmanipulated allogenic PBSCT.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the efficacy and safety of G-SCF-mobilized donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for treatment of relapse of hematologic malignancies after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, we performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of patients with morphologic (n = 36) or molecular (n = 22) relapse post transplantation. The 3-year post-DLI survival rates for therapeutic and preemptive DLI recipients were 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively. The occurrence of DLI-associated acute graft-versus-host disease predicted longer survival, whereas diagnosis of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma or myelodysplastic syndromes or early relapse after transplant (< 6 months) predicted shorter survival after therapeutic DLI. Cumulative incidence of progression to hematologic relapse and non-relapse mortality after preemptive DLI were 46.8% and 29.1%, respectively. Active disease prior to transplant and early molecular relapse after transplant (< 4 months) were the strongest predictors of non-relapse mortality after preemptive DLI. In conclusion, although therapeutic DLI had limited efficacy against T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma or myelodysplastic syndromes or early post-transplant relapse, patients who developed DLI-associated acute graft-versus-host disease would benefit from this procedure in the setting of G-SCF-mobilized DLI. Furthermore, preemptive DLI could protect half of patients from hematologic relapse after transplantation with acceptable toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.