ArticleSTAR protocols2022
Protocol for activity flow mapping of neurocognitive computations using the Brain Activity Flow Toolbox.
Article in STAR protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distributed cortical network dynamics of binocular convergent eye movements in humans.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Largely Intact But Less Reliable and Distributed Neural Representations of Subjective Value in Human Opioid Addiction.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional cognitive neuroscience uses task-evoked activations to map neurocognitive processes (and information) to brain regions; however, how those processes are generated is unknown. We developed activity flow mapping to identify and empirically validate network mechanisms underlying the generation of neurocognitive processes. This approach models the movement of task-evoked activity over brain connections to predict task-evoked activations. We present a protocol for using the Brain Activity Flow Toolbox (https://colelab.github.io/ActflowToolbox/) to identify network mechanisms underlying neurocognitive processes of interest. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Cole et al., 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.