Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128453›Full record

ReviewReproduction & fertility2021

Metabolomics in endometriosis: challenges and perspectives for future studies.

Camila N Ortiz, Annelyn Torres-Reverón, Caroline B Appleyard

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolomic differences between exanthematous drug eruption and infectious mononucleosis.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camila N OrtizDepartment of Basic Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, Puerto Rico, USA.
Annelyn Torres-ReverónDHR Health Institute for Research and Development, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Caroline B AppleyardDepartment of Basic Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, Puerto Rico, USA.
Ponce Health Sciences University · PRDoctors Hospital at Renaissance · US

Funding

Physical activity as a therapeutic intervention in endometriosisR15AT009915 · NCCIH · PONCE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI APPLEYARD, CAROLINE B · 2018 to 2018
$470k
NCCIH NIH HHS R15 AT009915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is a complex disease characterized by inflammation and the growth of endometrial- like glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. The pathophysiology of endometriosis is not entirely understood, however, with a prevalence of ~10% of women in their reproductive years, the disease symptoms significantly affect the quality of life of millions of women globally. Metabolomic studies have previously identified specific metabolites that could be a signature of endometriosis. This approach could potentially be used as a non-invasive tool for early diagnosis and provide a better understanding of endometriosis pathophysiology. This review aims to provide insight as to how endometriosis affects the metabolome by reviewing different studies that have used this approach to design follow-up studies. The search query included the term 'endometriosis' in combination with 'metabolomics', 'lipidomics', or 'sphingolipidomics' published between 2012 and 2020. We included studies in humans and animal models. Most studies reported differences in the metabolome of subjects with endometriosis in comparison to healthy controls and used samples taken from serum, endometrial tissue, follicular fluid, urine, peritoneal fluid, or endometrial fluid. Statistically significant metabolites contributed to group separation between patients and healthy controls. Reported metabolites included amino acids, lipids, organic acids, and other organic compounds. Differences in methods, analytical techniques, and the presence of confounding factors can interfere with results and interpretation of data. Metabolomics seems to be a promising tool for identifying significant metabolites in patients with endometriosis. Nonetheless, more investigation is needed in order to understand the significance of the study results. LAY SUMMARY: Endometriosis is a chronic disease affecting the quality of life in one out of every ten women during their reproductive years, causing pain and infertility. It is characterized by inflammation and growth of tissue like the endometrium (uterus lining) outside the uterine cavity. Studies have searched for a predictor of endometriosis-associated changes by observing small molecules necessary for metabolism on a large scale (metabolomics). Metabolomics could serve to resolve one of the biggest challenges that patients with endometriosis face: a delay in diagnosis. In this review, the authors summarize identified potential biomarkers from various bodily fluids and tissues that are characteristic of metabolic processes observed in endometriosis. Biomarkers include cell growth, cell survival, high energy demand, oxidative stress, and fatty acid levels. A metabolomics approach offers promise as a non-invasive tool to identify significant metabolite changes in patients with endometriosis, potentially leading to earlier diagnoses and new opportunities for back-translational strategies.

Indexed as

EndometriosisQuality of LifeAnimalsBiomarkersFemaleHumansInflammationMetabolomicsBiomarkersanimal modelsendometriosishuman subjectsmetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID35128453
PMCPMC8812441
OpenAlexW3147324171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.