Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128360›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Improving the diagnosis of prostate cancer by telomerase-positive circulating tumor cells: A prospective pilot study.

Zhenrong Yang, Hongsong Bai, Linjun Hu, Defeng Kong, Guoliang Li, Changyun Zhao, Lin Feng, Shujun Cheng, Jianzhong Shou, Wen Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Circulating tumour cell isolation, analysis and clinical application.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarkers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenrong YangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Hongsong BaiDepartment of Urology, Cancer Hospital of Huanxing Chaoyang District Beijing, Beijing 100122, China.
Linjun HuDepartment of Urology, Cancer Hospital of Huanxing Chaoyang District Beijing, Beijing 100122, China.
Defeng KongState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Guoliang LiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Changyun ZhaoChongqing Diatech Biotechnological Limited Company, Chongqing 400020, China.
Lin FengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Shujun ChengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Jianzhong ShouDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Wen ZhangDepartment of Immunology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Kaitai ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCancer Hospital of Huanxing Chaoyang District Beijing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is limited in identifying prostate cancer (PCa) with modestly elevated PSA levels. Therefore, a robust method for the diagnosis of PCa is urgently needed.

methodsA total of 203 men with a PSA level of ≥4 ng/ml were eligible for enrollment in this study from July 2018 to May 2021, and randomly divided into a training set (n=78) and a validation set (n=125). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were detected using telomerase-based CTC detection (TBCD), and the diagnostic ability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and logistic regression analyses.

findingsIn the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) of CTCs was 0.842 with a sensitivity of 80.33% and specificity of 82.35%. In the validation set, the AUC of CTCs was 0.789, with a sensitivity of 79.31% and specificity of 81.58%. There was no significant difference between CTCs (AUC=0.793) and PSA (AUC=0.697) in the range of 4-50 ng/ml. In the ranges of 4-20 ng/ml and 4-10 ng/ml, the AUC of CTCs were 0.811 and 0.825, respectively, which were superior to the AUC of PSA (0.588 and 0.541). The sensitivity and specificity of CTCs in the three PSA groups were higher than 80%. Moreover, we further established a CTC+PSA combined model, which could significantly improve the diagnostic ability of a PSA level of '4-10 ng/ml'.

interpretationTBCD could be a valuable method for distinguishing PCa and benign prostatic disease, especially in the PSA diagnostic gray area of '4-10 ng/ml'.

Indexed as

Circulating tumor cellDiagnosisLiquid biopsyProstate cancerProstate-specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID35128360
PMCPMC8808177
OpenAlexW4205112946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.