Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128286›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Synthesis and Evaluation of 1,3,5-Triaryl-2-Pyrazoline Derivatives as Potent Dual Inhibitors of Urease and α-Glucosidase Together with Their Cytotoxic, Molecular Modeling and Drug-Likeness Studies.

Rabia Mehmood, Amina Sadiq, Reem I Alsantali, Ehsan Ullah Mughal, Meshari A Alsharif, Nafeesa Naeem, Asif Javid, Munirah M Al-Rooqi, Gul-E-Saba Chaudhry, Saleh A Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Discovery ofFuture medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current status ofRSC advances · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rabia MehmoodDepartment of Chemistry, Govt. College Women University, Sialkot 51300, Pakistan.
Amina SadiqDepartment of Chemistry, Govt. College Women University, Sialkot 51300, Pakistan.
Reem I AlsantaliDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Ehsan Ullah MughalDepartment of Chemistry, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-9398
Meshari A AlsharifDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Nafeesa NaeemDepartment of Chemistry, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan.
Asif JavidDepartment of Chemistry, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan.
Munirah M Al-RooqiDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Gul-E-Saba ChaudhryInstitute of Marine Biotechnology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Saleh A AhmedDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-0380
Umm al-Qura University · SAUniversity of Gujrat · PKGovernment College Women University SialkotTaif University · SAUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present work, a concise library of 1,3,5-triaryl-2-pyrazolines (

Identifiers

PMID35128286
PMCPMC8811919
OpenAlexW4206350109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.