ArticleClinical research (Milpitas, Calif.)2020
Investigation of Bladder Cancer Cell Response to Cryoablation and Adjunctive Cisplatin Based Cryo/Chemotherapy.
Article in Clinical research (Milpitas, Calif.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Investigation of Lung Cancer Cell Response to Cryoablation and Adjunctive Gemcitabine-Based Cryo-Chemotherapy Using the A549 Cell Line.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Bladder cancer: therapeutic challenges and role of 3D cell culture systems in the screening of novel cancer therapeutics.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- Synergetic Thermal Therapy for Cancer: State-of-the-Art and the Future.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- An In Vitro Investigation into Cryoablation and Adjunctive Cryoablation/Chemotherapy Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Using the PANC-1 Cell Line.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Breast Cancer Cryoablation: Assessment of the Impact of Fundamental Procedural Variables in an In Vitro Human Breast Cancer Model.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Due to a rising annual incidence of bladder cancer, there is a growing need for development of new strategies for treatment. In 2018, the World Cancer Research Fund and other groups reported that there were ~550,000 new cases worldwide of bladder cancer. It has been further estimated that >200,000 individuals die annually from bladder cancer worldwide. Various treatment options exist. However, many if not all remain suboptimal. While the preferred chemotherapeutic options have changed in the past few years there have been few advances in the bladder cancer medical device field. Cryoablation is now being evaluated as a new option for the treatment of bladder cancer. While several studies have shown cryoablation to be promising for the treatment of bladder cancer, a lack of basic information pertaining to dosing (minimal lethal temperature) necessary to destroy bladder cancer has limited its use as a primary therapeutic option. Concerns with bladder wall perforation and other side effects have also slowed adoption. In an effort to detail the effects of freezing on bladder cancer, two human bladder cancer cell lines, SCaBER and UMUC3, were evaluated
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.