Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35128218›Full record

ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Integrating publicly available information to screen potential candidates for chemical prioritization under the Toxic Substances Control Act: A proof of concept case study using genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.

Grace Patlewicz, Jeffry L Dean, Catherine F Gibbons, Richard S Judson, Nagalakshmi Keshava, Leora Vegosen, Todd M Martin, Prachi Pradeep, Anita Simha, Sarah H Warren and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grace PatlewiczCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Jeffry L DeanCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Catherine F GibbonsCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Richard S JudsonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Nagalakshmi KeshavaCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Leora VegosenCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Todd M MartinCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Prachi PradeepCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Anita SimhaORAU, contractor to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the National Student Services Contract, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah H WarrenCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Maureen R GwinnCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
David M DeMariniCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) became law in the U.S. in 1976 and was amended in 2016. The amended law requires the U.S. EPA to perform risk-based evaluations of existing chemicals. Here, we developed a tiered approach to screen potential candidates based on their genotoxicity and carcinogenicity information to inform the selection of candidate chemicals for prioritization under TSCA. The approach was underpinned by a large database of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity information that had been compiled from various public sources. Carcinogenicity data included weight-of-evidence human carcinogenicity evaluations and animal cancer data. Genotoxicity data included bacterial gene mutation data from the

Indexed as

CarcinogenicityGenotoxicityMutagenicityToxic Substance Control ActTSCA

Identifiers

PMID35128218
PMCPMC8809402
OpenAlexW3198638072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.