ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022
Case of unilateral pellucid marginal corneal degeneration progressing to corneal perforation with keratoconus in contralateral eye.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pellucid Marginal Degeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report our findings in a case of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration (PMCD) in the left eye and keratoconus (KC) in the right eye, and to review earlier cases of PMCD and KC. OBSERVATIONS: A 45-year-old woman visited our hospital with a complaint of reduced vision in her right eye. She was predisposed to allergies since childhood and had a habit of rubbing her eyes. Based on the results of the corneal topographic study, we diagnosed her with KC in the right eye and PMCD in the left eye. We prescribed a rigid, gas permeable contact lens and treated her allergic conjunctivitis with ocular medications. Three years after her initial visit, she developed a corneal perforation in the left eye. The perforation was closed by conservative treatment consisting of therapeutic soft contact lens wear. One year after the cornea healed, the corneal astigmatism in the left eye was about one-half of what it was before the corneal perforation. Her corrected visual acuity improved to 1.0 with conventional spectacles. CONCLUSIONAND IMPORTANCE: We found a difference in the progression of KC and PMCD even when they occurred in same individual. We suggest that the atopic predisposition, which is considered a risk factor for acute hydrops in KC, to be a risk factor for acute hydrops and corneal perforation in eyes with PMCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.