Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127941›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2022

Effectiveness of Multistrain Probiotic Formulation on Common Infectious Disease Symptoms and Gut Microbiota Modulation in Flu-Vaccinated Healthy Elderly Subjects.

Anna Sandionigi, Alessandra De Giani, Francesco Tursi, Angela Michelotti, Enza Cestone, Silvana Giardina, Jessica Zampolli, Patrizia Di Gennaro

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Probiotic Modulation in Aging: Strain-Specific Geroprotective Effects inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Gut microbiota and healthy longevity.Science China. Life sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna SandionigiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Alessandra De GianiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Francesco TursiComplife Italia Srl, San Martino Siccomario (PV), Italy.
Angela MichelottiComplife Italia Srl, San Martino Siccomario (PV), Italy.
Enza CestoneComplife Italia Srl, San Martino Siccomario (PV), Italy.
Silvana GiardinaComplife Italia Srl, San Martino Siccomario (PV), Italy.
Jessica ZampolliDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Patrizia Di GennaroDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-7627
University of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decline of the immune system with aging leads elderly people to be more susceptible to infections, posing high risk for their health. Vaccination is thus important to cope with this risk, even though not always effective. As a strategy to improve protection, adjuvants are used in concomitance with vaccines, however, occasionally producing important side effects. The use of probiotics has been proposed as an alternative to adjuvants due to their efficacy in reducing the risk of common infections through the interactions with the immune system and the gut microbiota. A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was carried out on fifty elderly subjects, vaccinated for influenza, to determine the efficacy of a probiotic mixture in reducing common infection symptoms. The incidence of symptoms was evaluated after 28 days of probiotic intake (namely, T28) and after further 28 days of follow-up (namely, T56). The number of subjects, as well as the number of days with symptoms, was remarkably reduced at T28, and even more at T56 in the probiotic group. Furthermore, the influence of probiotics on immunological parameters was investigated, showing a significant positive improvement of total antioxidant capacity and

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesProbioticsAgedDouble-Blind MethodHumansInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35127941
PMCPMC8814717
OpenAlexW4210796634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.