Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127909›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Effectiveness of Maitland and Mulligan mobilization methods for adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ling-Ling Li, Xin-Jie Hu, Yong-Hui Di, Wei Jiao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07166068 (The Effect of Mobilization With Movement Versus Sham Mobilization on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07166068 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Mobilization With Movement Versus Sham Mobilization on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of JazanRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsManual Therapy (Mobilization with Movement), Exercise, sham mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling-Ling LiSport Medicine and Rehabilitation College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Xin-Jie HuSport Medicine and Rehabilitation College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yong-Hui DiSport Medicine and Rehabilitation College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Wei JiaoSport Medicine and Rehabilitation College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China. jiaowei01@vip.sina.com.
Beijing Sport University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a serious global problem, knee osteoarthritis (KOA) often leads to pain and disability. Manual therapy is widely used as a kind of physical treatment for KOA.

aimTo explore further the efficacy of Maitland and Mulligan mobilization methods for adults with KOA.

methodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science and Google Scholar from inception to September 20, 2020 to collect studies comparing Maitland and Mulligan mobilization methods in adults with KOA. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale for randomized controlled trials. Data analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.0 software.

resultsA total of 341 articles were screened from five electronic databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science and Google Scholar) after excluding duplicates. Ultimately, eight trials involving 471 subjects were included in present systematic review and meta-analysis. The mean PEDro scale score was 6.6. Mulligan mobilization was more effective in alleviating pain [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17 to 1.03,

conclusionMulligan mobilization technique is a promising intervention in alleviating pain and improving function score in KOA patients.

Indexed as

Knee osteoarthritisMaitland mobilizationManipulationManual therapyMeta-analysisMulligan mobilization

Identifiers

PMID35127909
PMCPMC8790437
OpenAlexW4206398742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.