Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127748›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Cholecalciferol vs. Small Doses of Alfacalcidol vs. Placebo in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Hemodialysis: A Randomized Parallel Group Study.

Joanna Matuszkiewicz-Rowińska, Paweł Kulicki, Paweł Zebrowski, Wiesław Klatko, Antoni Sokalski, Stanisław Niemczyk, Magdalena Wypych-Birecka, Jolanta Małyszko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of nutritional vitamin D in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder in children and adults with chronic kidney disease, on dialysis, and after kidney transplantation-a European consensus statement.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna Matuszkiewicz-RowińskaDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł KulickiDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł ZebrowskiDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Wiesław KlatkoNephrology Department, Regional Specialty Hospital, Ciechanów, Poland.
Antoni SokalskiDialysis Unit and Nephrology Department, Regional Specialty Hospital, Radom, Poland.
Stanisław NiemczykDepartment of Internal Medicine Nephrology and Dialysis, Military Medical Institute of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena Wypych-BireckaDiaverum Dialysis Center, Warszawa, Poland.
Jolanta MałyszkoDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLCiech (Poland) · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability of extrarenal tissues to convert 25(OH)D (calcidiol) into 1,25(OH)2D (calcitriol) and dependence of the conversion on substrate levels provide the rationale for supplementing vitamin D in dialysis patients who usually have severe depletion of both: 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D. The primary aim of the study was to compare effects of small doses of cholecalciferol (12,000 IU/week) with frequently used in Europe, small doses of alfacalcidol (1.5 μg/week) or placebo, given for 12 weeks, on serum 1,25(OH)

methodsThis was a prospective, randomized, partly double-blind (cholecalciferol vs. placebo) study. Out of 522 patients dialyzed in 5 centers in the Mazovian Province, 93 gave informed consent and met the inclusion criteria: any vitamin D metabolites and calcimimetics naïve; no history of liver or intestinal disease; serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml, iPTH <1,000 ->110 pg/ml, calcium <10.2, and phosphate <6.8 mg/dl. The subjects were stratified by serum iPTH, then randomized into 3 groups according to the treatment.

resultsTo our knowledge, this is the first study comparing head-to-head these drugs in the hemodialysis population. There were no significant differences between the groups at baseline. 81 patients completed the study. Cholecalciferol normalized serum 25(OH)D, with a mean rise from 12.9 ± 6.7 to 31.3 ± 10.1 ng/ml (

conclusionsIn most patients, treatment with cholecalciferol in a 12,000 IU/week dose permits safe correction of 25(OH)D deficiency and is more effective than 1.5 μg/week dose of alfacalcidol in rising serum 1,25(OH)

Indexed as

125(OH)2Dalfacalcidolcholecalciferolhemodialysisvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID35127748
PMCPMC8814355
OpenAlexW4206010797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.