Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127735›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2021

Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends.

Rupinder Mann, Mahesh Gajendran, Chandraprakash Umapathy, Abhilash Perisetti, Hemant Goyal, Shreyas Saligram, Juan Echavarria

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Temporal trends in colorectal resections for benign colorectal neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment and Techniques for Endoscopic Closure.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rupinder MannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Agnes Medical Center, Fresno, CA, United States.
Mahesh GajendranPaul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, United States.
Chandraprakash UmapathyDivision of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Abhilash PerisettiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Hemant GoyalThe Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA, United States.
Shreyas SaligramDivision of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Juan EchavarriaDivision of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
The University of Texas at San Antonio · USSaint Agnes Medical Center · USTexas Tech University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered "complex" based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.

Indexed as

colonoscopycolorectal cancercolorectal polypendoscopic mucosal resectionendoscopic submucosal dissection

Identifiers

PMID35127735
PMCPMC8811151
OpenAlexW4206536785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.