Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127645›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2021

Graph Neural Networks as a Potential Tool in Improving Virtual Screening Programs.

Luiz Anastacio Alves, Natiele Carla da Silva Ferreira, Victor Maricato, Anael Viana Pinto Alberto, Evellyn Araujo Dias, Nt Jose Aguiar Coelho

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luiz Anastacio AlvesLaboratory of Cellular Communication, Oswaldo Cruz Institute - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Natiele Carla da Silva FerreiraLaboratory of Cellular Communication, Oswaldo Cruz Institute - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Victor MaricatoLaboratory of Cellular Communication, Oswaldo Cruz Institute - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Anael Viana Pinto AlbertoLaboratory of Cellular Communication, Oswaldo Cruz Institute - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Evellyn Araujo DiasLaboratory of Cellular Communication, Oswaldo Cruz Institute - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Nt Jose Aguiar CoelhoNational Institute of Industrial Property - INPI and Veiga de Almeida University - UVA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of pharmaceutical companies, university laboratories and funding, less than one percent of initially researched drugs enter the commercial market. In this context, virtual screening (VS) has gained much attention due to several advantages, including timesaving, reduced reagent and consumable costs and the performance of selective analyses regarding the affinity between test molecules and pharmacological targets. Currently, VS is based mainly on algorithms that apply physical and chemistry principles and quantum mechanics to estimate molecule affinities and conformations, among others. Nevertheless, VS has not reached the expected results concerning the improvement of market-approved drugs, comprising less than twenty drugs that have reached this goal to date. In this context, graph neural networks (GNN), a recent deep-learning subtype, may comprise a powerful tool to improve VS results concerning natural products that may be used both simultaneously with standard algorithms or isolated. This review discusses the pros and cons of GNN applied to VS and the future perspectives of this learnable algorithm, which may revolutionize drug discovery if certain obstacles concerning spatial coordinates and adequate datasets, among others, can be overcome.

Indexed as

deep learningdrug discoveryGNNnatural productsvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35127645
PMCPMC8811035
OpenAlexW4206201713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.