Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127621›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2021

Bibliometric Analysis of International Scientific Production on Pharmacologic Treatments for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 During 2020.

Miguel A Ruiz-Fresneda, Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras, Carlos Ruiz-Fresneda, Rafael Ruiz-Pérez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SARS-CoV-2 and reproductive system: a scientometric study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel A Ruiz-FresnedaDepartment of Crystallography and Structural Biology, Instituto de Química-Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
Evaristo Jiménez-ContrerasEC3 Research Group, Department of Information and Communication Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Carlos Ruiz-FresnedaEC3 Research Group, Department of Information and Communication Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Rafael Ruiz-PérezEC3 Research Group, Department of Information and Communication Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Química Física Blas Cabrera · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 is causing a grave global health and economic crisis and the fight against the pandemic has led to unprecedented scientific activity. Bibliometrics could be a useful tool for guiding future researches lines and promoting international collaboration for an effective treatment. For this purpose, we have conducted a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on drugs and therapies used to treat COVID-19 during 2020. Methods: Data source: Web of Science. We gathered data on scientific production relating to drugs used to treat COVID-19. We calculated impact factors and analyzed production by institution, country, and journal, visualizing our results in bibliometric networks. Results: In 1 year, production relating to COVID-19 exceeded 100 000 publications, with over 6,500 on Drugs and COVID-19. Research into hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, remdesivir, lopinavir and ritonavir, tocilizumab and convalescent plasma is particularly noteworthy. Mean citations/study range from 11.9 to 15.4. Producer institutions fall into three groups: one in the US and centered on Harvard Medical School; another in Europe led by INSERS; and another in China led by Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Production by journal is widespread but the Conclusions: The volume of research that is currently under way is comparable to the magnitude of the pandemic itself. Such a high volume of studies is infrequent and the impact they have achieved has no known precedent. The producing countries are those with highest incidence of the pandemic and greatest scientific potential; moreover, inter-agency and international collaboration has reached extraordinarily high levels.

Indexed as

BibliometricsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCOVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassivePandemicsSARS-CoV-2United Statesbibliometric analysisbibliometric networkCOVID-19pharmacologic treatmentsSARS-CoV-2scientific productionvisualization

Identifiers

PMID35127621
PMCPMC8811030
OpenAlexW4206532058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.