Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Longitudinal Patterns of Food Procurement Over the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From a Canadian Online Household Survey.

Daiva E Nielsen, Katherine Labonté, Irem Karamanoglu, Hannah Yang Han, Mandana Tavanaei, Paul-Guy Duhamel, Luis B Agellon, Catherine Paquet, Laurette Dube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lessons from the IMPAACT of coronavirus disease 2019 public health restrictions on food allergy-associated anxiety.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daiva E NielsenSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Katherine LabontéSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Irem KaramanogluSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hannah Yang HanSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mandana TavanaeiSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Paul-Guy DuhamelSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Luis B AgellonSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Catherine PaquetFaculté des Sciences de l'administration, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Laurette DubeDesautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Consumer food procurement during the COVID-19 pandemic has been understudied. This investigation aimed to longitudinally evaluate food procurement patterns, concern of virus exposure in grocery retailers, and food access challenges over the pandemic among a sample of households in Quebec, Canada. Methods: Online surveys were collected at three time points of the pandemic: first wave in spring 2020 (lockdown period), summer 2020 (deconfinement period), and second wave in winter 2021 (curfew period). Respondents were the household's primary grocery shopper ( Results: Frequency of in-store grocery shopping was lowest during the lockdown (once per week or less), and significantly increased over time to resemble pre-pandemic frequency. Concern of virus exposure in grocery retailers and disinfection/discarding of food packaging was highest during the lockdown, but significantly decreased over time. At all time points, use of public transit, walking or cycling for grocery shopping was associated with regular use of no-contact grocery methods (curfew odds ratio (OR): 3.13 (95% confidence interval 1.60, 6.14). Age (60 years+) was associated with regular use during the lockdown [OR: 2.27 (1.13, 4.59)]. Conclusion: Among our sample, frequency of in-store grocery shopping was lowest and concern of virus exposure in stores was highest during the lockdown period. No-contact grocery use was associated with transportation mode and potentially with personal risk perception (age).

Indexed as

COVID-19Food SupplyCanadaCommunicable Disease ControlHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 pandemicfood procurementonline groceryonline surveyrisk perceptions

Identifiers

PMID35127611
PMCPMC8810501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.