Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2021

Interprofessional Consensus Regarding Design Requirements for Liquid-Based Perinatal Life Support (PLS) Technology.

M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt, E J T Verweij, Peter Andriessen, Willem P de Boode, Arend F Bos, Frank L M Delbressine, Alex J Eggink, Jan Jaap H M Erwich, Loe M G Feijs, Floris Groenendaal and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Multiscale Mathematical Model for Fetal Gas Transport and Regulatory Systems During Second Half of Pregnancy.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Reperfused human umbilical cords as anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. A Multiscale Mathematical Model for the Fetal Blood Circulation of the Second Half of Pregnancy.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Volume-Adjustable Artificial Womb for Extremely Preterm Infants.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der JagtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands.
E J T VerweijDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Fetal Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Peter AndriessenDepartment of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands.
Willem P de BoodeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Perinatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Arend F BosDepartment of Neonatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands.
Frank L M DelbressineDepartment of Industrial Design Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Alex J EgginkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jan Jaap H M ErwichDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Loe M G FeijsDepartment of Industrial Design Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Floris GroenendaalDepartment of Neonatology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Boris W W KramerDepartment of Neonatology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, Netherlands.
A Titia LelyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Rachel F A M LoopDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Franziska NeukampInstitute for Applied Medical Engineering and Clinic for Neonatology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Wes OnlandDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martijn A OudijkAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Arjan B Te PasDepartment of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Irwin K M ReissDepartment of Neonatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mark SchobererInstitute for Applied Medical Engineering and Clinic for Neonatology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ralph R ScholtenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Marc E A SpaandermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Myrthe van der VenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands.
Marijn J VermeulenDepartment of Neonatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Frans N van de VosseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
S Guid OeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands.
Eindhoven University of Technology · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMaastricht University · NLMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid-based perinatal life support (PLS) technology will probably be applied in a first-in-human study within the next decade. Research and development of PLS technology should not only address technical issues, but also consider socio-ethical and legal aspects, its application area, and the corresponding design implications. This paper represents the consensus opinion of a group of healthcare professionals, designers, ethicists, researchers and patient representatives, who have expertise in tertiary obstetric and neonatal care, bio-ethics, experimental perinatal animal models for physiologic research, biomedical modeling, monitoring, and design. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for research and development of PLS technology. These requirements are considering the possible respective user perspectives, with the aim to co-create a PLS system that facilitates physiological growth and development for extremely preterm born infants.

Indexed as

AAPTartificial placentadesign implicationsperinatal life supportuser perspectivesvalue-sensitive design

Identifiers

PMID35127593
PMCPMC8809135
OpenAlexW4206360010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.