ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
The Mutational Landscape of Early-Onset Breast Cancer: A Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selenium-Containing Compounds in Breast Cancer Therapy.Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- A pro-carcinogenic oral microbe internalized by breast cancer cells promotes mammary tumorigenesis.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Preliminary exploration of the optimal timing of chemoimmunotherapy combined with radiotherapy for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and analysis of prognostic factors: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of Distinct Molecular and Immunological Features of Breast Cancer on the Effectiveness of Therapies in Ghana.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026Review
- Next-generation sequencing in breast cancer: current clinical applications and future directions.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Reclassifying Menopausal Breast Cancer and Assessing Non-Genetic Risk Factors in Ghanaian Women: Insights from a Cohort Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Associations between subjective social status and predictors of interest in genetic testing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Clinicopathologic characteristics of early-onset breast cancer: a comparative analysis of cases from across Ghana.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing in Lung Cancer Patients: A Comparative Approach in NSCLC and SCLC Mutational Landscapes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Tumor Profiling Using an NGS Cancer Hotspot Panel in Ukrainian Breast Cancer Patients: Initial Findings of Mutation Frequencies and Clinicopathologic Characteristics.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAround 5%-7% of breast cancer cases are diagnosed in women younger than 40, making it the leading cause of female cancer in the 25- to 39-year-old age group. Unfortunately, young age at diagnosis is linked to a more aggressive tumor biology and a worse clinical outcome. The identification of the mutational landscape of breast cancer in this age group could optimize the management.
methodsWe performed NGS analysis in paraffin blocks and blood samples of 32 young patients with breast cancer [<40 years] and 90 older patients during the period 2019 through 2021. All patients were treated in a single institution at the Oncology Department of "Alexandra" Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, Greece.
resultsBreast tumors were characterized more frequently by HER2 overexpression [25% vs 18.9%], higher ki67 levels [75% vs 61%] and lower differentiation [71.9% vs 60%] in the younger group. PIK3CA [6/20; 30%] and TP53 [6/20; 30%] were the most frequent pathogenic somatic mutations identified in young patients, while one case of BRCA2 somatic mutation [1/20; 5%] and one case of PTEN somatic mutation [1/20; 5%] were also identified. PIK3CA mutations [16/50; 32%] and TP53 mutations [20/50; 40%] were the most common somatic mutations identified in older patients, however other somatic mutations were also reported (ATM, AKT, CHEK2, NRAS, CDKN2A, PTEN, NF1, RB1, FGFR1, ERBB2). As for germline mutations, CHEK2 [3/25; 12%] was the most common pathogenic germline mutation in younger patients followed by BRCA1 [2/25; 8%]. Of note, CHEK2 germline mutations were identified less frequently in older patients [2/61; 3%] among others [BRCA1 (2/61; 3%), ATM (2/61; 3%), APC (1/61; 1,6%) and BRCA2 (1/61; 1,6%)].
conclusionWe here report the mutational profile identified
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.