ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Recurrence Monitoring Value of Plasma CYFRA21-1 and NSE Levels in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of squamous cell carcinoma antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment in predicting the outcome of esophageal cancer patients: insights from a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- DDR1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: bioinformatics discovery and experimental validation.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- FAM83A-AS1 predicts severe development of non-small cell lung cancer and adverse postoperative prognosis of thoracotomy.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- CA199 and CEA expression levels, and minimally invasive postoperative prognosis analysis in esophageal squamous carcinoma patients.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy crossover combined with targeted therapy in advanced esophageal cancer patients following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy failure.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic prediction model for patients with pathological T1N0 stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergone esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Latest insights into the global epidemiological features, screening, early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- HDS screening with patient-derived primary cells guided individualized therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Role of Serum CYFRA 21-1 in Diagnosis and Prognostic in Colorectal Liver Metastases.Cancer management and research · 2023Article
- Review
- Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine Anticancer Decoction Combined with Basic Chemotherapy and Nursing Intervention on Oral Cancer Patients after Surgery and Its Effect on Tumor Markers and Immune Function.BioMed research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical values of single markers and combination in the diagnosis, short-term efficacy and recurrence risk assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
methodsTotally 50 patients with I-IVa stage ESCC, 50 healthy controls and 11 patients with recurrent esophageal cancer after comprehensive treatment were enrolled. Serum biomarkers were collected and evaluated. Serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and after treatment.
resultsThe diagnostic efficacy ROC curve area of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE in esophageal cancer was 0.70, 0.71 and 0.64(all P <0.05), respectively, the sensitivity was 80%, 88.89% and 60% respectively, and the specificity was 53%, 58.5% and 58% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined detection were 68% and 78% respectively. The area under ROC curve was 0.75. CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE were significantly higher than the healthy control group and thus can be used as diagnostic markers of esophageal cancer (all P <0.05). After standard treatment, the clinical CR and PR rate of patients with positive CYFRA21-1 or NSE before treatment was significantly lower than that of patients with negative CYFRA21-1 or NSE (X
conclusionCYFRA21-1 and NSE may help to predict the response of ESCC to CRT, and play important roles in the diagnosis and recurrence monitoring of esophageal cancer. These markers have a diagnostic value of esophageal cancer when combined with CEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.