Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127439›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2022

Does vehicle-based delivery of mesenchymal stromal cells give superior results in knee osteoarthritis? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Madhan Jeyaraman, B Shivaraj, Shiva Kumar Bingi, Rajni Ranjan, Sathish Muthu, Manish Khanna

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Madhan JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
B ShivarajIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shiva Kumar BingiIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rajni RanjanDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sathish MuthuDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manish KhannaIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University · INSharda University · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designMeta-analysis.

objectivesWe aim to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) available in the literature. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library till August 2021 for RCTs analyzing the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Visual Analog Score (VAS) for Pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, and adverse events were the outcomes analyzed. Analysis was performed in R-platform using OpenMeta [Analyst] software.

results21 studies involving 936 patients were included for analysis. None of the studies made a direct comparison of the direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs, hence we pooled the results of all the included studies of both groups and made a comparative analysis of their outcomes. Although at 6 months, both direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs showed significantly better VAS improvement (p = 0.002, p = 0.010), it was not consistent at 1 year for the vehicle delivery (p = 0.973). During 6 months and 12 months, direct delivery of MSCs (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) outperformed vehicle delivery (p = 0.969, p = 0.922) compared to their control based on WOMAC scores respectively. Both direct (p = 0.713) and vehicle-based delivery (p = 0.123) of MSCs did not produce significant adverse events compared to their controls.

conclusionOur analysis of literature showed that current clinically employed methods of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs such as platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid did not demonstrate superior results compared to direct delivery, concerning the efficacy of treatment measured by improvement in pain, functional outcomes, and safety. Hence, we urge future clinical trials to be conducted to validate the effectiveness of advanced delivery vehicles such as composite bioscaffolds to establish their practical utility in cartilage regeneration with respect to its encouraging in-vitro evidence.

Indexed as

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cellBone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cellCartilage regenerationKnee osteoarthritisMesenchymal stem cellMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35127439
PMCPMC8803619
OpenAlexW4206778798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.