Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127367›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Covid-19 vaccine acceptance and associated factors among pregnant women in Pennsylvania 2020.

Kristin K Sznajder, Kristen H Kjerulff, Ming Wang, Wenke Hwang, Sarah I Ramirez, Chintan K Gandhi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making Among Black Pregnant and Postpartum Women.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin K SznajderDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Kristen H KjerulffDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Ming WangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Wenke HwangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Sarah I RamirezDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Chintan K GandhiDepartment of Pediatrics, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on factors associated with vaccine acceptance among pregnant women are critical to the rapid scale up of interventions to improve vaccine uptake. When COVID-19 vaccines were still in the testing phases of research, we surveyed pregnant women accessing prenatal care at an academic medical institution in Central Pennsylvania, United States to examine factors associated with vaccine acceptance. Willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine once a vaccine became available was asked as part of an ongoing study on the COVID-19 pandemic and pregnancy (n = 196). Overall, 65% of women reported they would be willing or somewhat willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Women who had received an influenza vaccine within the past year were more likely to be willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than women who had never received an influenza vaccine or those who received it over one year ago (aOR 4.82; 95% CI 2.17, 10.72). Similarly, women who were employed full-time were more willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than women who were not employed full time (aOR 2.22; 95% CI 1.02, 4.81), and women who reported feeling overloaded were more willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than women who did not feel overloaded (aOR 2.18; 95% CI 1.02, 4.68). Our findings support the need to increase vaccination education among pregnant women before vaccines are rolled out, especially those who have not received an influenza vaccine within the past year. Improved understanding of willingness to vaccinate among pregnant women will improve future pandemic responses and current vaccination efforts.

Indexed as

COVID-19Immunization during pregnancyPennsylvaniaPregnant WomenSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccine-preventable diseases

Identifiers

PMID35127367
PMCPMC8800167
OpenAlexW4210477138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.