Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127359›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Provider-perceived barriers to patient adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Xuan Zhu, Emily Weiser, Debra J Jacobson, Joan M Griffin, Paul J Limburg, Lila J Finney Rutten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Effectiveness ofCancers · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Racial and sociodemographic distribution of colorectal cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuan ZhuMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA.
Emily WeiserExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Debra J JacobsonDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joan M GriffinMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA.
Paul J LimburgDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lila J Finney RuttenDivision of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · USExact Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAverage-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized in the US. Provider recommendation is strongly associated with CRC screening completion. To inform interventions aimed at improving screening uptake, we examined providers' perspectives on patient and health system barriers to CRC screening adherence, along with associated system-level interventions to improve uptake.

methodsWe conducted an online survey between November and December 2019 with a sample of primary care clinicians (PCCs) and gastroenterologists (GIs) from a validated panel of US clinicians (814 PCCs, 159 GIs; completion rates: 25.3% for PCCs, 29.6% for GIs). Clinicians rated the extent to which each patient and health system factor interferes with patient adherence with CRC screening recommendations and the availability of practice interventions to improve screening rates.

resultsProvider-reported top barriers to CRC screening included patient discomfort with offered screening method (66%), cost (62-64%), and perceived low importance of screening (62%). Additional barriers included providers prioritizing urgent health concerns over screening (45-48%), not offering a choice of screening options (42-48%), lacking time to educate patients about screening (38-45%), and lacking education about available screening options (37-40%). Most frequently reported system-level interventions to improve CRC screening rates included patient education materials (57-62%) and point of care prompts (56-61%). Other interventions were less frequently reported, although variations existed by clinical specialty regarding barriers and interventions.

conclusionsAddressing barriers to CRC screening requires system-level interventions, including provider training on shared decision-making, automated scheduling and reminder processes, and policies to increase clinician time for preventive screening consultations.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancer screeningPatient adherenceProvider recommendationsSystem-level intervention

Identifiers

PMID35127359
PMCPMC8800035
OpenAlexW4200337224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.