Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127313›Full record

ReviewInternational cancer conference journal2022

Should we still be using bolus 5-FU prior to infusional regimens in gastrointestinal cancers? A practical review.

Larissa Costa Amorim, Renata D'Alpino Peixoto

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International cancer conference journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Onvansertib in Combination with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab in Second-Line Treatment of KRAS-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase Ib Clinical Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larissa Costa AmorimCentro Paulista de Oncologia (Grupo Oncoclínicas), Av. Faria Lima, 4300, 6th floor, Sao Paulo, 04538-132 Brazil.
Renata D'Alpino PeixotoCentro Paulista de Oncologia (Grupo Oncoclínicas), Av. Faria Lima, 4300, 6th floor, Sao Paulo, 04538-132 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-7951
Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

5-fluorouracil (5-FU), a pyrimidine analogue with antimetabolite activity, is one of the most widely used drugs in Oncology and many different regimens have been described regarding its use. Nowadays, the modified de Gramont is the most popular schedule of 5-FU to treat gastrointestinal cancers and may be given either alone or combined with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and monoclonal antibodies. The true clinical value of bolus 5-FU right before infusional regimens remains to be determined since no randomized trials have addressed this issue. This manuscript aims to review the history of 5-FU, its mechanism of action and the data exploring the role of bolus 5-FU.

Indexed as

Bolus 5-fluorouracilColorectal cancerInfusional 5-FULeucovorinPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID35127313
PMCPMC8786986
OpenAlexW3215652634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.