Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127273›Full record

ArticleJournal of health disparities research and practice2021

Can Community Gardens with Workshops Increase Gardening Behavior? A Navajo Wellness Collaboration.

Kevin Lombard, India J Ornelas, Desiree Deschenie, Felix Nez, Sonia Bishop, Katie Osterbauer, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Shirley A A Beresford

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health disparities research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin LombardNew Mexico State University Agricultural Science Center at Farmington.
India J OrnelasUniversity of Washington.
Desiree DeschenieNew Mexico State University Agricultural Science Center at Farmington.
Felix NezDine College Land Grant Office.
Sonia BishopFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
Katie OsterbauerUniversity of Washington.
Eileen Rillamas-SunFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
Shirley A A BeresfordUniversity of Washington.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNew Mexico State University · US

Funding

Research Education About Cancer and Health (REACH) CoreU54CA132381 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Julian Simon · 2007 to 2026
$25.3M
Undergraduate Student Training in Cancer ResearchU54CA132383 · NCI · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI MICHELE Irene SHUSTER · 2007 to 2026
$21.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132381NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This project evaluated the potential efficacy of a

methodsWe used a quasi-experimental pre-post study design to estimate the effect of a community gardening intervention. Primary outcomes of interest were gardening frequency and fruit and vegetable consumption. Community gardens were constructed and planted in two communities on the Navajo Nation. In addition, a series of gardening workshops were held in each community. Community members were recruited to complete surveys at time points before and after the workshops. The time between baseline and follow-up was approximately one year.

resultsWe surveyed 169 participants at one time point at least, across both communities, and 25 of these participated in the gardening workshops. Within the 169, there was a cohort of 32 participants completing both baseline and follow-up surveys. For this cohort, interest in gardening increased from 78% to 97% (p=0.014), but none of the changes in gardening self-efficacy, knowledge or gardening frequency reached statistical significance. There were no measurable changes in reported fruit and vegetable consumption, self-efficacy or knowledge. Overall, the reported financial barriers to gardening increased from baseline to follow-up from 4.6 to 5.5 (p=0.035). Among those who completed follow-up, those who attended at least one workshop gardened more frequently than those who did not attend any workshops (21 times per month compared to 10 times per month (p=0.065).

conclusionDespite enthusiasm for the community garden in both the communities studied and the increased interest in gardening, workshop attendance and participant retention in the study were low. These factors limited our ability to evaluate the potential efficacy of the intervention on gardening and healthy eating behaviors. Nonetheless, we found some evidence that participating in gardening workshops may lead to increased gardening frequency. Future studies should augment the intervention to include explicit efforts to reduce barriers to long term engagement and extend intervention reach.

Identifiers

PMID35127273
PMCPMC8813171
OpenAlexW3178737969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.