Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127255›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2022

Comparing CAR and TCR engineered T cell performance as a function of tumor cell exposure.

Tassilo L A Wachsmann, Anne K Wouters, Dennis F G Remst, Renate S Hagedoorn, Miranda H Meeuwsen, Eline van Diest, Jeanette Leusen, Jürgen Kuball, J H Frederik Falkenburg, Mirjam H M Heemskerk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tassilo L A WachsmannDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-2530
Anne K WoutersDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9861-7276
Dennis F G RemstDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Renate S HagedoornDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Miranda H MeeuwsenDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9268-3141
Eline van DiestCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeanette LeusenCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4982-6914
Jürgen KuballCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3914-7806
J H Frederik FalkenburgDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9819-4813
Mirjam H M HeemskerkDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-9133
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have resulted in profound clinical responses in the treatment of CD19-positive hematological malignancies, but a significant proportion of patients do not respond or relapse eventually. As an alternative to CAR T cells, T cells can be engineered to express a tumor-targeting T cell receptor (TCR). Due to HLA restriction of TCRs, CARs have emerged as a preferred treatment moiety when targeting surface antigens, despite the fact that functional differences between engineered TCR (eTCR) T and CAR T cells remain ill-defined. Here, we compared the activity of CAR T cells versus engineered TCR T cells in targeting the B cell malignancy-associated antigen CD20 as a function of antigen exposure. We found CAR T cells to be more potent effector cells, producing higher levels of cytokines and killing more efficiently than eTCR T cells in a short time frame. However, we revealed that the increase of antigen exposure significantly impaired CAR T cell expansion, a phenotype defined by high expression of coinhibitory molecules and effector differentiation. In contrast, eTCR T cells expanded better than CAR T cells under high antigenic pressure, with lower expression of coinhibitory molecules and maintenance of an early differentiation phenotype, and comparable clearance of tumor cells.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalT-LymphocytesAntigens, CD20HumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, CD20Receptors, Antigen, T-Cellactivation-induced cell deathantigen exposureCARchimeric antigen receptorcomparisonexhaustionsolid tumorsT cell receptorTCRtumor load

Identifiers

PMID35127255
PMCPMC8812760
OpenAlexW4210728753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.