Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127168›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2022

d-enantiomers of CATH-2 enhance the response of macrophages against

Roel M van Harten, Johanna L M Tjeerdsma-van Bokhoven, Astrid de Greeff, Melanie D Balhuizen, Albert van Dijk, Edwin J A Veldhuizen, Henk P Haagsman, Maaike R Scheenstra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial Peptide CATH-2 Attenuates Avian PathogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. CATH-2-derived antimicrobial peptide inhibits multidrug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Innate Immune Response toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roel M van HartenDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johanna L M Tjeerdsma-van BokhovenDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Astrid de GreeffWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Melanie D BalhuizenDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Albert van DijkDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Edwin J A VeldhuizenDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Henk P HaagsmanDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maaike R ScheenstraDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the increase of antibiotic resistant bacterial strains, there is an urgent need for development of alternatives to antibiotics. Cathelicidins can be such an alternative to antibiotics having both a direct antimicrobial capacity as well as an immunomodulatory function. Previously, the full d-enantiomer of chicken cathelicidin-2 (d-CATH-2) has shown to prophylactically protect chickens against infection 7 days post hatch when administered Objectives: To further evaluate d-CATH-2 in mammals as a candidate for an alternative to antibiotics.In this study, the prophylactic capacity of d-CATH-2 and two truncated derivatives, d-C(1-21) and d-C(4-21), was determined in mammalian cells. Methods: Antibacterial assays; immune cell differentiation and modulation; cytotoxicity, isothermal titration calorimetry; Results: d-CATH-2 and its derivatives were shown to have a strong direct antibacterial capacity against four different Conclusion: d-enantiomers of CATH-2 show promise as anti-infectives against pathogenic

Indexed as

Streptococcus suisAnimalsCathelicidinsChickensMacrophagesMiceSerogroupCathelicidinsCATH-2CathelicidinMacrophageMouseStreptococcus suis

Identifiers

PMID35127168
PMCPMC8799869
OpenAlexW3170607774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.