ArticleEvolution letters2022
Genome-wide evolutionary response of European oaks during the Anthropocene.
Article in Evolution letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population history rather than tree age contributes to the evolutionary importance of ancient trees in an endangered conifer.Nature plants · 2026Article
- What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Comparative Genomic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Re-Interpreting Genetic Offset: Quantifying the Least Required Evolutionary Rate Under Climate Change at the Mediterranean Range Margin of European Beech.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- The FORGENIUS Genomic Resources: New Genotyping Tools and Genomic Data for 23 Forest Tree Species and Their Genetic Conservation Units.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- In silico prediction of variant effects: promises and limitations for precision plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Response of Pedunculate Oak (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Resilience of genetic diversity in forest trees over the Quaternary.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The contribution of gene flow, selection, and genetic drift to five thousand years of human allele frequency change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Tracking population structure and phenology through time using ancient genomes from waterlogged white oak wood.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- The contribution of gene flow, selection, and genetic drift to five thousand years of human allele frequency change.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A haplotype-resolved chromosome-scale genome for Quercus rubra L. provides insights into the genetics of adaptive traits for red oak species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Divergent selection predating the Last Glacial Maximum mainly acted on macro-phenotypes in Norway spruce.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Teasing apart the joint effect of demography and natural selection in the birth of a contact zone.The New phytologist · 2022Article
- Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and OrphanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The pace of tree microevolution during Anthropocene warming is largely unknown. We used a retrospective approach to monitor genomic changes in oak trees since the Little Ice Age (LIA). Allelic frequency changes were assessed from whole-genome pooled sequences for four age-structured cohorts of sessile oak (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.