Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127126›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2022

Investigating socioeconomic inequalities in BMI growth rates during childhood and adolescence.

Anagha Killedar, Thomas Lung, Alison Hayes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anagha KilledarSchool of Public Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-8827
Thomas LungSchool of Public Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-6311
Alison HayesSchool of Public Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8679-6040
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries report socioeconomic inequalities in childhood obesity, but when they develop is not well-characterised. Studies rarely isolate BMI growth rates from overall BMI, perhaps overlooking an important precursor to the observed inequalities in obesity. The objective of this study was to determine the age at which inequalities in BMI growth rates develop in children and whether they are similar across the BMI spectrum.

methodsUsing the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (

resultsThe slope (SII) and relative (RII) indexes of inequality for annual BMI growth were greatest in middle childhood (age 4-11 years) (SII 0.25, RII 1.83 (boys) 1.78 (girls)) and were moderate during adolescence (age 10-17 years) (SII 0.11, RII 1.16 [boys] 1.15 [girls]). In early childhood, there was little evidence of inequality in annual BMI growth except in children with obesity. In middle childhood and adolescence, inequalities were greater at higher weight status. The GEE indicated that both weight status (

conclusionsInequalities in annual BMI growth were strongest in middle childhood, and widest in children at the upper end of the BMI spectrum. This could signify a key age bracket to intervene clinically and at a public health level and improve inequalities in childhood obesity.

Indexed as

BMI growth ratechildreninequalitiessocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID35127126
PMCPMC8804938
OpenAlexW3190732167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.