Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127056›Full record

ArticleHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2022

Patient-held health IT adoption across the primary-secondary care interface: a Normalisation Process Theory perspective.

Stephen McCarthy, Ciara Fitzgerald, Laura Sahm, Colin Bradley, Elaine K Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen McCarthyBusiness Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ciara FitzgeraldBusiness Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Laura SahmBusiness Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Colin BradleyBusiness Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Elaine K WalshBusiness Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-4207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-held Health Information Technologies (HIT) can reduce medical error by improving communication between patients and the healthcare team. Despite the proposed benefits, the roll-out of patient-held HIT solutions remains nascent, leaving considerable gaps in our understanding of the adoption challenges inherent. This paper adopts Normalisation Process Theory to study the factors which support or impede the adoption and "normalisation" of patient-held HIT, particularly across the primary-secondary care interface. The authors conducted an in-depth case study of HIT adoption across four GP practices, and the wards of a 350 bed hospital. 35 semi-structured interviews were completed. Findings point towards both user-specific and network-specific factors as significant challenges to normalisation across primary-secondary care. This includes factors related to interactional workability, skill set workability, relational integration, and contextual integration. We also discuss challenges specific to patient-held HIT adoption e.g., understanding the patient/clinician experience, supporting informal clinician networks, and spanning across IT boundaries.

Indexed as

diffusionelectronic medical recordelectronic personal recordhealth information exchangeHealth information systemsimplementationNormalisation Process Theory

Identifiers

PMID35127056
PMCPMC8812738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.