ArticleEcology and evolution2022
Testing the effectiveness of genetic monitoring using genetic non-invasive sampling.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Noninvasive Genetic Monitoring Guides Recovery of the Endangered Columbia Basin Pygmy Rabbits (Genes · 2025Article
- Scaling-up RADseq methods for large datasets of non-invasive samples: Lessons for library construction and data preprocessing.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Strategic Sampling of Eurasian Otter Spraints for Genetic Research in South Korea: Enhancing PCR Success and Data Accuracy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Southern marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) populations assessed using Amplicon Sequencing on fecal samples.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Non-invasive sampling reveals low mitochondrial genetic diversity for an island endemic species: The critically endangered Grenada DoveEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Influence of scat ageing on the gut microbiome: how old is too old?BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Susceptibility to a sexually transmitted disease in a wild koala population shows heritable genetic variance but no inbreeding depression.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- Testing the effectiveness of genetic monitoring using genetic non-invasive sampling.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective conservation requires accurate data on population genetic diversity, inbreeding, and genetic structure. Increasingly, scientists are adopting genetic non-invasive sampling (gNIS) as a cost-effective population-wide genetic monitoring approach. gNIS has, however, known limitations which may impact the accuracy of downstream genetic analyses. Here, using high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from blood/tissue sampling of a free-ranging koala population (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.