Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35126987›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

Drug-likeness scoring based on unsupervised learning.

Kyunghoon Lee, Jinho Jang, Seonghwan Seo, Jaechang Lim, Woo Youn Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 2,5-diaryloxazolo[4,5-Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular similarity: Theory, applications, and perspectives.Artificial intelligence chemistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ExploringHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyunghoon LeeDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34 141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.
Jinho JangDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34 141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.
Seonghwan SeoDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34 141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-7825
Jaechang LimHITS Incorporation 124 Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu Seoul 06 234 Republic of Korea jaechang@hits.ai.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-4283
Woo Youn KimDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34 141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-2111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-likeness prediction is important for the virtual screening of drug candidates. It is challenging because the drug-likeness is presumably associated with the whole set of necessary properties to pass through clinical trials, and thus no definite data for regression is available. Recently, binary classification models based on graph neural networks have been proposed but with strong dependency of their performances on the choice of the negative set for training. Here we propose a novel unsupervised learning model that requires only known drugs for training. We adopted a language model based on a recurrent neural network for unsupervised learning. It showed relatively consistent performance across different datasets, unlike such classification models. In addition, the unsupervised learning model provides drug-likeness scores that well separate distributions with increasing mean values in the order of datasets composed of molecules at a later step in a drug development process, whereas the classification model predicted a polarized distribution with two extreme values for all datasets presumably due to the overconfident prediction for unseen data. Thus, this new concept offers a pragmatic tool for drug-likeness scoring and further can be applied to other biochemical applications.

Identifiers

PMID35126987
PMCPMC8729801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.