Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35126961›Full record

SynthesisJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Blockchain and Fog Computing in IoT-Driven Healthcare Services for Smart Cities.

M M Kamruzzaman, Bingxin Yan, Md Nazirul Islam Sarker, Omar Alruwaili, Min Wu, Ibrahim Alrashdi

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomedical blockchain with practical implementations and quantitative evaluations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M M KamruzzamanDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8464-1523
Bingxin YanSchool of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9441-1027
Md Nazirul Islam SarkerSchool of Political Science and Public Administration, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8887-521X
Omar AlruwailiDepartment of Computer Engineering and Networks, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.
Min WuSchool of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ibrahim AlrashdiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7537-5542
Jouf University · SASichuan University · CNNeijiang Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, technology has been evolving rapidly. Due to the consequent impact of smart technologies, it becomes a ubiquitous part of life. These technologies have led to the emergence of smart cities that are geographic areas driven by advanced information and communication technologies. In the context of smart cities, IoT, blockchain, and fog computing have been found as the significant drivers of smart initiates. In this recognition, the present study is focused on delineating the impact and potential of blockchain, IoT, and fog computing on healthcare services in the context of smart cities. In pursuit of this objective, the study has conducted a systematic review of literature that is most relevant to the topic of the paper. In order to select the most relevant and credible articles, the researcher has used PRISMA and AMSTAR that have culminated in the 10 most relevant articles for the present study. The findings revealed that IoT, blockchain, and fog computing had become drivers of efficiency in the healthcare services in smart cities. Among the three technologies, IoT has been found to be widely incorporated. However, it is found to be lacking in terms of cost efficiency, data privacy, and interoperability of data. In this recognition, blockchain technology and fog computing have been found to be more relevant to the healthcare sector in smart cities. Blockchain has been presented as a promising technology for ensuring the protection of private data, creating a decentralized database, and improving the interoperability of data while fog computing has been presented as the promising technology for low-cost remote monitoring, reducing latency and increasing efficiency.

Indexed as

BlockchainCitiesDelivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID35126961
PMCPMC8808208
OpenAlexW4210499992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.