Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35126956›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis.

Guodong Gao, Linzhong Cao, Xiaozheng Du, Bin Xu, Ping Zhang, Xiaogang Zhang, Rong Wang, Zhen Quan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Host Subcellular Organelles: Targets of Viral Manipulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guodong GaoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu 730000, China.
Linzhong CaoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu 730000, China.
Xiaozheng DuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu 730000, China.
Bin XuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu 730000, China.
Ping ZhangCollege of Electrical and Information Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Gansu 730050, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1633-5302
Xiaogang ZhangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu 730000, China.
Rong WangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu 730000, China.
Zhen QuanDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu 730000, China.
Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNLanzhou University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of minimally invasive technology, minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has become an effective way to treat lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common diseases that cause backache or lumbago and sciatica. This article compares and analyzes the clinical efficacy of 60 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. It can be seen that the wound by MIS-TLIF is significantly less than that of traditional open surgery, and the postoperative recovery of MIS-TLIF is faster. So, MIS-TLIF is one of the concepts of minimally invasive surgery. The age distribution ranged from 56 to 78 years, with an average of 65.7 years. 31 cases were treated with MIS-TLIF (MIS-TLIF group), and 29 were treated with traditional posterior open surgery (TLIF group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage of the operation area were recorded. After statistical testing, the intraoperative blood loss, incision size, and postoperative drainage volume of the wound in the MIS-TLIF group were significantly less than those in the TLIF group. The results of JOA score, ODI score, and VAS score during the postoperative follow-up period were comparable to those of open surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is effective in treating lumbar spinal stenosis.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionSpinal StenosisAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalConstriction, PathologicHumansLumbar VertebraeMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35126956
PMCPMC8808212
OpenAlexW4210516796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.