ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2022
Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Matched and Measured: An In-depth Look at the Interventional Cardiology Fellowship Match-Fellows' Perspective.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Quantifying Radiation Exposure Across Cardiac Catheterization Procedures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Occupational Radiation Exposure and Thyroid Nodules in Healthcare Workers: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Variability in State-Level Regulations Regarding Occupational Radiation Exposure.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- CCTA-Guided Selective Invasive Coronary Catheterization: A Strategy to Reduce Contrast Volume and Improve Efficiency.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Safety and Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the AVIAR 2.0 System: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm, Open, Investigator-Initiated, Post-Approval Clinical Trial.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- Advancements in Cardiac Catheterization Safety: Novel Radiation Protection Approaches Redefining Occupational Health.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing cancer treatment: The role of radiopharmaceuticals in modern cancer therapy.Precision radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Radiation Exposure and Protection for (Assumed) Pregnant Interventional Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Implementing a 'Lead [Apron]-Free' Cardiac Catheterization: Current Status.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Radiation Exposure, Training, and Safety in Cardiology.JACC. Advances · 2024Review
- Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape.Cureus · 2023Article
- Lead Cap Use in Interventional Cardiology: Time to Protect Our Head in the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory?Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023Review
- [Advantages of simulation-based training in improving skills of beginners in interventional cardiology procedures: a Tunisian cross-sectional study].The Pan African medical journal · 2023Article
- Efficacy of pelvic-abdominal shields in radiation protection of patients undergoing radial coronary angiography: experimental analysis and recommendations for radiology practice.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
- Update on Radiation Safety in the Cath Lab - Moving Toward a "Lead-Free" Environment.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization interventions adversely impacts both the patients and medical staff. In recent years, radiation dose in cardiac catheterization interventions has become a topic of increasing interest in interventional cardiology and there is a strong interest in reducing radiation exposure during the procedures. This review presents the current status of radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and summarizes a practical approach for radiation dose management for minimizing radiation exposure. This review also presents recent innovations that have clinical potential for reducing radiation during cardiac interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.