ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Application and Evaluation of a 64-Slice CT Three-Dimensional Fusion Technique in the Determination of the Effective Ablation Margin after Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic significance of globulin/low-density lipoprotein ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablative therapy: a retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Different Registration Algorithms to Reduce Motion Artifacts in CT-Thermography (CTT).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Retracted: Application and Evaluation of a 64-Slice CT Three-Dimensional Fusion Technique in the Determination of the Effective Ablation Margin after Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-02Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the low accuracy of traditional three-dimensional fusion technology in radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma, this paper studies the advantages of three-dimensional CT fusion technology over traditional two-dimensional imaging technology in preoperative visualization and radiofrequency ablation path selection of hepatocellular carcinoma. To study the prognostic differences of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with different ablation margins (AM) in the three groups, so as to explore the best AM value, so as to minimize the liver injury caused by radiofrequency ablation. The selected patients underwent CT plain scan and three-phase enhancement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation and were rechecked every 6 months. For recurrent patients, CT was rechecked every three months. The images were obtained by GE 64-slice spiral CT. The thickness of the reconstruction layer is 1 mm, and the interval is 1 mm. The reconstructed image is imported into 3D fusion software. The three-dimensional images of tumor focus, hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein were reconstructed by two experienced doctors by superimposing the saved tumor images, merging the vascular images into the display, and measuring the ablation boundary (AM value). The results showed that the recurrence rate in group A was higher than that in group B (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.