Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35126551›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2021

Epidemiology, management, and survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Upper Silesia, Poland: an Utstein-style report.

Kamil Bujak, Klaudiusz Nadolny, Jerzy R Ładny, Bartosz Hudzik, Dorota Zyśko, Przemysław Trzeciak, Mariusz Gąsior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kamil Bujak3 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland.
Klaudiusz NadolnyDepartment of Emergency Medical Service, Strategic Planning University of Dabrowa Gornicza, Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland.
Jerzy R ŁadnyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Bartosz Hudzik3 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland.
Dorota ZyśkoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Przemysław Trzeciak3 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland.
Mariusz Gąsior3 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the growing number of studies on the epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Poland, this issue has not been sufficiently studied. Notably, there has been a lack of uniform Utstein-style data reporting.

aimTo evaluate the epidemiology of OHCA, patient characteristics, the laypeople and emergency medical service (EMS) response to cardiac arrest, and outcomes of OHCA patients, based on a prospective registry encompassing a population of 2.7 million Poles. MATERIAL AND

methodsConsecutive, adult, EMS-treated OHCA cases in 2018 were analyzed. Prehospital data were collected using case report forms by EMS. Information on in-hospital procedures and outcomes was based on data from the public payer of health care services. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to find independent predictors of survival to discharge.

resultsA total of 1392 patients were included. Most OHCA occurred at home (74.7%). In 66.8% of OHCA cases, the cardiac arrest was witnessed by bystanders and in another 20.4% by EMS. Laypeople performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in 54.4% of non-EMS-witnessed events, and an automated external defibrillator (AED) was used in 4.6% of patients who received bystander CPR. Finally, 30.7% of all patients were transported to the hospital, and 9.2% survived to hospital discharge. Epinephrine administration, unwitnessed OHCA, longer response time, older age, and initial non-shockable rhythm were independently associated with lower survival to discharge.

conclusionsThe prognosis of OHCA patients in Poland is poor. There is still room for improvement in increasing the prevalence of bystander CPR and AED use before EMS arrival.

Indexed as

automated external defibrillatorscardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationemergency medical servicemyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID35126551
PMCPMC8802637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.