ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
Screening and Identification of Survival-Associated Splicing Factors in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality. Many studies have shown that aberrant alternative splicing (AS) can lead to tumorigenesis, and splicing factors (SFs) serve as an important function during AS. In this research, we propose an analysis method based on synergy to screen key factors that regulate the initiation and progression of LUSC. We first screened alternative splicing events (ASEs) associated with survival in LUSC patients by bivariate Cox regression analysis. Then an association network consisting of OS-ASEs, SFs, and their targeting relationship was constructed to identify key SFs. Finally, 10 key SFs were selected in terms of degree centrality. The validation on TCGA and cross-platform GEO datasets showed that some SFs were significantly differentially expressed in cancer and paracancer tissues, and some of them were associated with prognosis, indicating that our method is valid and accurate. It is expected that our method would be applied to a wide range of research fields and provide new insights in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.