Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35126417›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Breeding Schemes: What Are They, How to Formalize Them, and How to Improve Them?

Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran, Zelalem Gebeyehu, Dorcus Gemenet, Christian Werner, Marlee Labroo, Solomon Sirak, Peter Coaldrake, Ismail Rabbi, Siraj Ismail Kayondo, Elizabeth Parkes and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clonal diploid and autopolyploid breeding strategies to harness heterosis: insights from stochastic simulation.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanny Covarrubias-PazaranExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Zelalem GebeyehuIndependent Researcher, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dorcus GemenetExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Christian WernerExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Marlee LabrooExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Solomon SirakExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Peter CoaldrakeExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Ismail RabbiInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Siraj Ismail KayondoInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Elizabeth ParkesInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Edward KanjuInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Edwige Gaby Nkouaya MbanjoInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Afolabi AgbonaInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Peter KulakowInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Michael QuinnExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Jan DebaeneExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture · NGCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formalized breeding schemes are a key component of breeding program design and a gateway to conducting plant breeding as a quantitative process. Unfortunately, breeding schemes are rarely defined, expressed in a quantifiable format, or stored in a database. Furthermore, the continuous review and improvement of breeding schemes is not routinely conducted in many breeding programs. Given the rapid development of novel breeding methodologies, it is important to adopt a philosophy of continuous improvement regarding breeding scheme design. Here, we discuss terms and definitions that are relevant to formalizing breeding pipelines, market segments and breeding schemes, and we present a software tool, Breeding Pipeline Manager, that can be used to formalize and continuously improve breeding schemes. In addition, we detail the use of continuous improvement methods and tools such as genetic simulation through a case study in the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Cassava east-Africa pipeline. We successfully deploy these tools and methods to optimize the program size as well as allocation of resources to the number of parents used, number of crosses made, and number of progeny produced. We propose a structured approach to improve breeding schemes which will help to sustain the rates of response to selection and help to deliver better products to farmers and consumers.

Indexed as

breeding pipelinebreeding schemecontinuous improvementgenetic simulationmarket segmentproduct profile

Identifiers

PMID35126417
PMCPMC8813775
OpenAlexW4205716110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.