ArticleFrontiers in neurology2021
Constructing a Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Model Based on Microarray.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple sclerosis is an immune-mediated demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. Because of the complexity of etiology, pathology, clinical manifestations, and the diversity of classification, the diagnosis of MS is very difficult. We found that McDonald Criteria is very strict and relies heavily on the evidence for DIS and DIT. Therefore, we hope to find a new method to supplement the evidence and improve the accuracy of MS diagnosis.
resultsWe finally selected GSE61240, GSE18781, and GSE185047 based on the GPL570 platform to build a diagnosis model. We initially selected 54 MS susceptibility locus genes identified by IMSGC and WTCCC2 as predictors for the model. After Random Forests and other series of screening, the logistic regression model was established with 4 genes as the final predictors. In external validation, the model showed high accuracy with an AUC of 0.96 and an accuracy of 86.30%. Finally, we established a nomogram and an online prediction tool to better display the diagnosis model.
conclusionThe diagnosis model based on microarray data in this study has a high degree of discrimination and calibration in the validation set, which is helpful for diagnosis in the absence of evidence for DIS and DIT. Only one SLE case was misdiagnosed as MS, indicating that the model has a high specificity (93.93%), which is useful for differential diagnosis. The significance of the study lies in proving that it is feasible to identify MS by peripheral blood RNA, and the further application of the model and be used as a supplement to McDonald Criteria still need to be trained with larger sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.