Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125871›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse : research and treatment2022

Effects of a New York Medicaid Care Management Program on Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services and Medicaid Spending: Implications for Defining the Target Population.

Charles J Neighbors, Rajeev Yerneni, Yi Sun, Sugy Choi, Constance Burke, Megan A O'Grady, Rebecca McDonald, Jon Morgenstern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse : research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles J NeighborsCenter on Addiction, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-8389
Rajeev YerneniCenter on Addiction, New York, NY, USA.
Yi SunNew York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, Albany, NY, USA.
Sugy ChoiCenter on Addiction, New York, NY, USA.
Constance BurkeNew York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, Albany, NY, USA.
Megan A O'GradyCenter on Addiction, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca McDonaldCenter on Addiction, New York, NY, USA.
Jon MorgensternCenter on Addiction, New York, NY, USA.
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University · USNew York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services · USKing's College London · GBNorthwell Health · US

Funding

Disease Management for Chronic Drug AbuseR01DA023891 · NIDA · PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION · PI MORGENSTERN, JON · 2007 to 2011
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe examined the effects of a statewide New York (NY) care management (CM) program for substance use disorder (SUD), Managed Addiction Treatment Services (MATS), on SUD treatment services' utilization and spending among patients with a recent history of high Medicaid spending and among those for whom a predictive algorithm indicates a higher probability of outlier spending in the following year.

methodsWe applied difference-in-difference analyses with propensity score matching using NY Medicaid claims data and a state registry of SUD-treatment episodes from 2006 to 2009. A total of 1263 CM enrollees with high SUD treatment spending (>$10K) in the prior year and a matched comparison group were included in the analysis. Crisis care utilization for SUD (detoxification and hospitalizations), outpatient SUD treatment, and Medicaid spending were examined over 12 months among both groups. CM effects among predicted high-future-spending patients (HFS) were also analyzed.

resultsCM increased outpatient SUD treatment visits by approximately 10.5 days (95% CI = 0.9, 20.0). CM crisis care and spending outcomes were not statistically different from comparison since both conditions had comparable pre-post declines. Conversely, CM significantly reduced SUD treatment spending by approximately $955 (95% CI = -1518, -391) and reduced days of detox utilization by about 1.0 days (95% CI = -1.9, -0.1) among HFS.

conclusionFindings suggest that CM can reduce SUD treatment spending and utilization when targeted at patients with a greater likelihood of high future spending, indicating the potential value of predictive models to select CM patients.

Indexed as

administrative claims healthcareMedicaidmultiple chronic conditionsprogram evaluationSubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID35125871
PMCPMC8808013
OpenAlexW4210577312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.