Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125865›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2022

Treatment Decision-Making in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Perceptions of Locus of Control Among Patient, Caregiver, and Physician Triads.

Frank A Schumacher, Irene B Helenowski, Laura B Oswald, Brian D Gonzalez, James T Benning, Alicia K Morgans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frank A SchumacherFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9995-7456
Irene B HelenowskiFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Laura B OswaldProgram of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6281-2512
Brian D GonzalezProgram of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-5735
James T BenningFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alicia K MorgansFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple treatments for metastatic prostate cancer have similar efficacy, leaving patients with complicated treatment choices. Shared decision-making can facilitate difficult treatment decisions, but the extent to which this is used for metastatic prostate cancer is unknown. We assessed patient, caregiver, and physician perceptions of decision locus of control (shared decision-making vs physician- or patient-directed decisions) and the degree of agreement between groups.

methodsTriads of patients, caregivers, and physicians completed surveys of decision-making practices after a clinic visit in which a decision occurred. To evaluate the degree of agreement for decision locus of control, we used the quadratic-weighted kappa coefficient (κ). We used relative frequencies to evaluate which knowledge learned and treatment factors were most strongly endorsed by patients as informing and influencing their treatment decision-making, respectively.

resultsFifty triads participated, with median patient age of 72 years. A majority of patients, caregivers, and physicians reported shared decision-making (66%, 56%, and 52%, respectively). Patients and physicians demonstrated minimal agreement about decision locus of control (44%, κ=0.35 [SD = 0.52]), but caregiver reports were not statistically significantly associated with physician and patient reports (38%, κ=0.23, [SD = 0.28]),

conclusionThis study characterized metastatic prostate cancer patients', caregivers', and physicians' experiences and communication preferences for treatment decision-making. Patients and physicians had greater agreement in decision locus of control compared with caregivers, yet patient-physician agreement was minimal. Metastatic prostate cancer patients report being influenced by information about treatment efficacy and clear next steps, and a desire for patient-friendly language and an invitation to be as involved in decision making at their preferred level. Emphasizing these may increase agreement in decision locus of control between all participants in the decision-making process.

Indexed as

cancer survivorshipdecision makingprostate cancershared decision makingtreatment decisions

Identifiers

PMID35125865
PMCPMC8811793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.