Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125834›Full record

ArticleInformation processing in medical imaging : proceedings of the ... conference2019

On Training Deep 3D CNN Models with Dependent Samples in Neuroimaging.

Yunyang Xiong, Hyunwoo J Kim, Bhargav Tangirala, Ronak Mehta, Sterling C Johnson, Vikas Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Information processing in medical imaging : proceedings of the ... conference, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Longitudinal self-supervised learning.Medical image analysis · 2021
    Article
  2. A Variational Approximation for Analyzing the Dynamics of Panel Data.Uncertainty in artificial intelligence : proceedings of the ... conference. Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yunyang XiongUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Madison WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-1111-2222-3333
Hyunwoo J KimKorea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.ORCID 1111-2222-3333-4444
Bhargav TangiralaUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Madison WI 53706, USA.ORCID 2222-3333-4444-5555
Ronak MehtaUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Madison WI 53706, USA.ORCID 3333-4444-5555-6666
Sterling C JohnsonUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Madison WI 53706, USA.ORCID 4444-5555-6666-7777
Vikas SinghUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Madison WI 53706, USA.ORCID 5555-6666-7777-8888

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
The Longitudinal Course of Neural Function and Amyloid in People At Risk for ADR01AG021155 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sterling C Johnson · 2004 to 2026
$27.0M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAPPELL, RICHARD J · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Algebraic Formulations for Characterizing Structural Brain Connectivity Changes and Pathology Transmission Networks in Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG059312 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BENDLIN, BARBARA BRIGITTA, SINGH, VIKAS · 2019 to 2019
$1.8M
Maximizing Power in AD Clinical Trials via Multimodal Machine LearningR01AG040396 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Manifold-valued statistical models for longitudinal morphometic analysis in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD)R01EB022883 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C, SINGH, VIKAS · 2016 to 2018
$995k
CRCNS: Pooling Multisite data and Staistical Tests for analyzing biomarkers of Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG062336 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2018 to 2018
$660k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021155NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040396NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059312NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG062336NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is much interest in developing algorithms based on 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for performing regression and classification with brain imaging data and more generally, with biomedical imaging data. A standard assumption in learning is that the training samples are independently drawn from the underlying distribution. In computer vision, where we have millions of training examples, this assumption is violated but the empirical performance may remain satisfactory. But in many biomedical studies with just a few hundred training examples, one often has multiple samples per participant and/or data may be curated by pooling datasets from a few different institutions. Here, the violation of the independent samples assumption turns out to be more significant, especially in small-to-medium sized datasets. Motivated by this need, we show how 3D CNNs can be modified to deal with dependent samples. We show that even with standard 3D CNNs, there is value in augmenting the network to exploit information regarding dependent samples. We present empirical results for predicting cognitive trajectories (slope and intercept) from morphometric change images derived from multiple time points. With terms which encode dependency between samples in the model, we get consistent improvements over a strong baseline which ignores such knowledge.

Identifiers

PMID35125834
PMCPMC8813050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.