SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2022
Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pancreatic Cancer in Celiac Disease Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Predictors of Progression to Villous Atrophy in Children with Type 1 Diabetes and Potential Celiac Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Long-term treatment with denosumab in patients with celiac disease and osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: a retrospective study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Timing the Scan: Optimizing Screening for Osteoporosis and Risk of Fracture in Celiac Disease.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- Cancer Risk in Clinically Recognized Celiac Disease: A Nationwide Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adherence to guidelines, pitfalls, and emerging technologies in endoscopic practice for celiac disease: a nationwide SIGENP survey.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-augmented small bowel capsule endoscopy for coeliac disease: a literature review on accuracy, workflow, and safety.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Influence of commensal bacteria on the proteolytic and antigenic profiles of INFOGEST-like digested wheat gliadin.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Low positive and borderline negative transglutaminase antibody levels are frequently associated with a coeliac disease diagnosis.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Microbial associations and viruses on the risk of celiac disease (MAVRiC): a longitudinal post-hoc case-cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of a novel flow cytometry multiplex immunoassay for the diagnosis of celiac disease simultaneously with autoimmune diabetes.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Haplotype analysis reveals pleiotropic disease associations in the HLA region.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Risk of new-onset type 1 diabetes in individuals with celiac disease and thyroid disease-An observational study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Observational
- Enhancing Self-Care Education in Celiac Disease Through Mobile Health: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of celiac disease on a gluten-free diet: a multicenter prospective quasi-experimental clinical study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Celiac Disease-Narrative Review on Progress in Celiac Disease.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Long-term risk of chronic liver disease in patients with celiac disease: a nationwide population-based, sibling-controlled cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Celiac Disease: Beyond Diet and Food Awareness.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWheat and other gluten-containing grains are widely consumed, providing approximately 50% of the caloric intake in both industrialised and developing countries. The widespread diffusion of gluten-containing diets has rapidly led to a sharp increase in celiac disease prevalence. This condition was thought to be very rare outside Europe and relatively ignored by health professionals and the global media. However, in recent years, the discovery of important diagnostic and pathogenic milestones has led to the emergence of celiac disease (CD) from obscurity to global prominence. These modifications have prompted experts worldwide to identify effective strategies for the diagnosis and follow-up of CD. Different scientific societies, mainly from Europe and America, have proposed guidelines based on CD's most recent evidence.
aimTo identify the most recent scientific guidelines on CD, aiming to find and critically analyse the main differences.
methodsWe performed a database search on PubMed selecting papers published between January 2010 and January 2021 in the English language. PubMed was lastly accessed on 1 March 2021.
resultsWe distinguished guidelines from 7 different scientific societies whose reputation is worldwide recognized and representative of the clinical practice in different geographical regions. Differences were noted in the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis, HLA testing, follow-up protocols, and procedures.
conclusionWe found a relatively high concordance between the guidelines for CD. Important modifications have occurred in the last years, especially about the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis in children. Other modifications are expected in the next future and will probably involve the extension of the non-invasive diagnosis to the adult population and the follow-up modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.