Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125684›Full record

ArticleCellulose (London, England)2022

Comparison of paper-based nucleic acid extraction materials for point-of-care testing applications.

Ruihua Tang, Min Li, Xueyan Yan, Mingyue Xie, Li Na Liu, Zedong Li, Feng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellulose (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruihua TangThe Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049 People's Republic of China.
Min LiCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, 710021 People's Republic of China.
Xueyan YanCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, 710021 People's Republic of China.
Mingyue XieCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, 710021 People's Republic of China.
Li Na LiuChina Light Industry International Engineering CO., LTD, Beijing, 100026 People's Republic of China.
Zedong LiThe Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049 People's Republic of China.
Feng XuThe Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049 People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cheap, rapid, simple and equipment-free nucleic acid extraction (NAE) is highly preferred for implementing nucleic acid detection at point-of-care (POC). Paper-based NAE materials have been extensively utilized due to their low cost, abundance, portability, biocompatibility and ease of chemical modification. However, it is challenging for users to choose the proper one from existing paper-based NAE materials for specific POC applications, which is determined by their physical and chemical properties. Additionally, building the relationship between the physical and chemical properties and the NAE efficiency of paper-based materials is instructive for development of new paper-based NAE materials. In this study, we first systematically compared the physical and chemical properties of six widely used paper-based NAE materials (namely Whatman filter paper #1, FTA card, FTA elute card, Fusion 5, silica membrane and polyethersulfone (PES) membrane), and then evaluated their NAE efficiency. The obtained results indicated that pore uniformity, wet strength, porosity and functional groups are key parameters to affect the efficiency of NAE. The NAE performance of FTA card is the best with high concentration and purity. Finally, we envision that more cost-effective paper-based NAE materials will be developed for POCT application in the future. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10570-022-04444-6.

Indexed as

Cotton fiberGlass fiberNucleic acid extractionPaper-based materialPES membrane

Identifiers

PMID35125684
PMCPMC8799969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.