Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125668›Full record

ArticleNeural computing & applications2022

A Bayesian finite-element trained machine learning approach for predicting post-burn contraction.

Ginger Egberts, Marianne Schaaphok, Fred Vermolen, Paul van Zuijlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computing & applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ginger EgbertsDelft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-6496
Marianne SchaaphokDelft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Fred VermolenResearch Group Computational Mathematics(CMAT),Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2212-1711
Paul van ZuijlenBurn Centre and Department of Plastic,Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-8848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injuries can decrease the quality of life of a patient tremendously, because of esthetic reasons and because of contractions that result from them. In severe case, skin contraction takes place at such a large extent that joint mobility of a patient is significantly inhibited. In these cases, one refers to a contracture. In order to predict the evolution of post-wounding skin, several mathematical model frameworks have been set up. These frameworks are based on complicated systems of partial differential equations that need finite element-like discretizations for the approximation of the solution. Since these computational frameworks can be expensive in terms of computation time and resources, we study the applicability of neural networks to reproduce the finite element results. Our neural network is able to simulate the evolution of skin in terms of contraction for over one year. The simulations are based on 25 input parameters that are characteristic for the patient and the injury. One of such input parameters is the stiffness of the skin. The neural network results have yielded an average goodness of fit ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00521-021-06772-3.

Indexed as

Feed-forward neural networkMachine learningMedical applicationMonte Carlo simulationsMorphoelasticityPost-burn scar contraction

Identifiers

PMID35125668
PMCPMC8801043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.