Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125541›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2022

COVID-19 response: effectiveness of weekly rapid risk assessments, Italy.

Flavia Riccardo, Giorgio Guzzetta, Alberto Mateo Urdiales, Martina Del Manso, Xanthi D Andrianou, Antonino Bella, Patrizio Pezzotti, Simona Carbone, Tiziana De Vito, Francesco Maraglino and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Measuring hospital care resilience: a systematic literature review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Flavia RiccardoIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giorgio GuzzettaFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Alberto Mateo UrdialesIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Martina Del MansoIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Xanthi D AndrianouIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Antonino BellaIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Patrizio PezzottiIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Simona CarboneMinistry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Tiziana De VitoMinistry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Francesco MaraglinoMinistry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio DemicheliAgenzia di Tutela della Salute (ATS) Milano, Milan, Italy.
Claudio DarioRegione Umbria, Perugia, Italy.
Enrico CoscioniRegione Campania, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni RezzaMinistry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Andrea UrbaniMinistry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Stefano MerlerFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Silvio BrusaferroIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Italian COVID-19 monitoring group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemAfter Italy's first national restriction measures in 2020, a robust approach was needed to monitor the emerging epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at subnational level and provide data to inform the strengthening or easing of epidemic control measures. APPROACH: We adapted the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control rapid risk assessment tool by including quantitative and qualitative indicators from existing national surveillance systems. We defined COVID-19 risk as a combination of the probability of uncontrolled transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and of an unsustainable impact of COVID-19 cases on hospital services, adjusted in relation to the health system's resilience. The monitoring system was implemented with no additional cost in May 2020. LOCAL

settingThe infectious diseases surveillance system in Italy uses consistent data collection methods across the country's decentralized regions and autonomous provinces. RELEVANT CHANGES: Weekly risk assessments using this approach were sustainable in monitoring the epidemic at regional level from 4 May 2020 to 24 September 2021. The tool provided reliable assessments of when and where a rapid increase in demand for health-care services would occur if control or mitigation measures were not increased in the following 3 weeks. LESSONS LEARNT: Although the system worked well, framing the risk assessment tool in a legal decree hampered its flexibility, as indicators could not be changed without changing the law. The relative complexity of the tool, the impossibility of real-time validation and its use for the definition of restrictions posed communication challenges.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsHumansItalyRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35125541
PMCPMC8795855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.