Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125225›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Conditionality of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in European countries.

Leonardo W Heyerdahl, Muriel Vray, Benedetta Lana, Nastassia Tvardik, Nina Gobat, Marta Wanat, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Sibyl Anthierens, Herman Goossens, Tamara Giles-Vernick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leonardo W HeyerdahlAnthropology & Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Muriel VrayEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Benedetta LanaAnthropology & Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Nastassia TvardikAnthropology & Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Nina GobatNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
Marta WanatNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
Sarah Tonkin-CrineNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
Sibyl AnthierensDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Gouverneur Kinsbergen, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Herman GoossensLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Tamara Giles-VernickAnthropology & Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France. Electronic address: tamara.giles-vernick@pasteur.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 vaccine rollout has offered a powerful preventive measure to help control SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Nevertheless, long-standing public hesitation around vaccines heightened concerns that vaccine coverage would not achieve desired public health impacts, particularly in light of more contagious variants. This cross-sectional survey was conducted online just before the European vaccine rollout in December 2020 among 7000 respondents (aged 18-65) in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Ukraine. The survey included open text boxes for fuller explanation of responses. Overall, 56.9% of respondents would accept a COVID-19 vaccine, 19.0% would not, and 24.1% did not know or preferred not to say. By country, between 44% (France) and 66% (Italy) of respondents would accept a COVID-19 vaccine. Respondents expressed conditionality in open responses, voicing concerns about vaccine safety and mistrust of authorities. We highlight lessons learned about the dynamism of vaccine conditionality and persistence of safety concerns.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2VaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19EuropeMixed methodsVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35125225
PMCPMC8806150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.