Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125221›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

A decade of data: Adolescent vaccination in the vaccine safety datalink, 2007 through 2016.

Stephanie A Irving, Holly C Groom, Padma Dandamudi, Matthew F Daley, James G Donahue, Julianne Gee, Rulin Hechter, Lisa A Jackson, Nicola P Klein, Elizabeth Liles and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephanie A IrvingCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: Stephanie.A.Irving@kpchr.org.
Holly C GroomCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Padma DandamudiCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Matthew F DaleyInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
James G DonahueCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Julianne GeeImmunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rulin HechterDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Lisa A JacksonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicola P KleinKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Northern California Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Elizabeth LilesCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Tanya R MyersImmunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shannon StokleyImmunization Services Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetween May 2005 and March 2007, three vaccines were recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for routine use in adolescents in the United States: quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY), tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap), and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). Understanding historical adolescent vaccination patterns may inform future vaccination coverage efforts for these and emerging adolescent vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines.

methodsThis was a descriptive, retrospective cohort study. All vaccines administered to adolescents aged 11 through 18 years in the Vaccine Safety Datalink population between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 were examined. Vaccination coverage was assessed by study year for ≥1 dose Tdap or Td, ≥1 dose Tdap, ≥1 dose MenACWY, ≥1 dose HPV, and ≥3 dose HPV. The proportion of vaccine visits with concurrent vaccination (≥2 vaccines administered at the same visit) was calculated by sex and study year. The most common vaccine combinations administered in the study population were described by sex for two time periods: 2007-2010 and 2011-2016.

resultsThe number of 11-18-year-olds in the study population averaged 522,565 males and 503,112 females per study year. Between January 2007 and December 2016 there were 4,884,553 vaccine visits in this population (45% among males). The overall proportion of concurrent vaccine visits among males was 43% (33-61% by study year). Among females, 39% of all vaccine visits included concurrent vaccination (32-48% by study year). Vaccine coverage for Tdap, MenACWY, and 1- and 3-dose HPV increased across the study period. A wide variety of vaccine combinations were administered among both sexes and in both time periods.

conclusionsThe high vaccine uptake and multitude of vaccine combinations administered concurrently in the adolescent population of the Vaccine Safety Datalink provide historical patterns with which to compare future adolescent vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

VaccinationVaccinesAdolescentCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleMaleMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinesAdolescent vaccinationHuman papillomavirus vaccineMeningococcal conjugate vaccineTetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccineVaccine administrationVaccine coverageVaccine Safety Datalink

Identifiers

PMID35125221
PMCPMC8813203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.