Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125094›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Collaborative case-based learning with programmatic team-based assessment: a novel methodology for developing advanced skills in early-years medical students.

Mariel James, Ana Madeira Teixeira Baptista, Deepak Barnabas, Agata Sadza, Susan Smith, Omar Usmani, Chris John

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Evaluating the Efficacy of Case-Based Learning for Medical Oncology Trainees: A Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariel JamesFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine , Hammersmith Campus, Room 6N5c, Commonwealth Building, W12 0NN, London, UK.
Ana Madeira Teixeira BaptistaFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine , Hammersmith Campus, Room 6N5c, Commonwealth Building, W12 0NN, London, UK.
Deepak BarnabasFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine , Hammersmith Campus, Room 6N5c, Commonwealth Building, W12 0NN, London, UK.
Agata SadzaFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine , Hammersmith Campus, Room 6N5c, Commonwealth Building, W12 0NN, London, UK.
Susan SmithFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine , Hammersmith Campus, Room 6N5c, Commonwealth Building, W12 0NN, London, UK.
Omar UsmaniFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine , Hammersmith Campus, Room 6N5c, Commonwealth Building, W12 0NN, London, UK.
Chris JohnFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine , Hammersmith Campus, Room 6N5c, Commonwealth Building, W12 0NN, London, UK. c.john@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImperial College London launched a new, spiral undergraduate medical curriculum in September 2019. Clinical & Scientific Integrative cases (CSI) is an innovative, flagship module, which uses pioneering methodology to provide early-years learning that [1] is patient-centred, [2] integrates clinical and scientific curriculum content, [3] develops advanced team-work skills and [4] provides engaging, student-driven learning. These aims are designed to produce medical graduates equipped to excel in a modern healthcare environment.

methodsCSI has adopted a novel educational approach which utilises contemporary digital resources to deliver a collaborative case-based learning (CBL) component, paired with a team-based learning (TBL) component that incorporates both learning and programmatic assessment. This paper serves to explore how first-year students experienced CSI in relation to its key aims, drawing upon quantitative and qualitative data from feedback surveys from CSI's inaugural year. It provides a description and analysis of the module's design, delivery, successes and challenges.

resultsOur findings indicate that CSI has been extremely well-received and that the majority of students agree that it met its aims. Survey outputs indicate success in integrating multiple elements of the curriculum, developing an early holistic approach towards patients, expediting the development of important team-working skills, and delivering authentic and challenging clinical problems, which our students found highly relevant. Challenges have included supporting students to adapt to a student-driven, deep learning approach.

conclusionsFirst-year students appear to have adopted a patient-centred outlook, the ability to integrate knowledge from across the curriculum, an appreciation for other team members and the self-efficacy to collaboratively tackle challenging, authentic clinical problems. Ultimately, CSI's innovative design is attractive and pertinent to the needs of modern medical students and ultimately, future doctors.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateInterdisciplinary PlacementStudents, MedicalCurriculumFeedbackHumansSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID35125094
PMCPMC8818362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.