ArticleBMC medical education2022
Collaborative case-based learning with programmatic team-based assessment: a novel methodology for developing advanced skills in early-years medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Case-Based Learning for Medical Oncology Trainees: A Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Pooled it
- Implementation strategies of team-based learning in undergraduate medical curricula: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing physiology learning through group dynamics: outcomes and perceptions of medical students.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Reciprocal cognitive and emotional interaction in STEMM university learning and teaching.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Use of Animations Depicting Cardiac Electrical Activity to Improve Confidence in Understanding of Cardiac Pathology and Electrocardiography Traces Among Final-Year Medical Students: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- The validity of Engagement and Feedback Assessments (EFAs): identifying students at risk of failing.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Comparing the Efficacy of Individual Approaches and Team-Based Approaches in Solving Clinical Case Vignettes.Cureus · 2023Article
- Using team-based learning to optimize undergraduate family medicine clerkship training: mixed methods study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Accelerating medical education with ChatGPT: an implementation guide.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2023Article
- First-year medical students' perceptions of a self-regulated learning-informed intervention: an exploratory study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImperial College London launched a new, spiral undergraduate medical curriculum in September 2019. Clinical & Scientific Integrative cases (CSI) is an innovative, flagship module, which uses pioneering methodology to provide early-years learning that [1] is patient-centred, [2] integrates clinical and scientific curriculum content, [3] develops advanced team-work skills and [4] provides engaging, student-driven learning. These aims are designed to produce medical graduates equipped to excel in a modern healthcare environment.
methodsCSI has adopted a novel educational approach which utilises contemporary digital resources to deliver a collaborative case-based learning (CBL) component, paired with a team-based learning (TBL) component that incorporates both learning and programmatic assessment. This paper serves to explore how first-year students experienced CSI in relation to its key aims, drawing upon quantitative and qualitative data from feedback surveys from CSI's inaugural year. It provides a description and analysis of the module's design, delivery, successes and challenges.
resultsOur findings indicate that CSI has been extremely well-received and that the majority of students agree that it met its aims. Survey outputs indicate success in integrating multiple elements of the curriculum, developing an early holistic approach towards patients, expediting the development of important team-working skills, and delivering authentic and challenging clinical problems, which our students found highly relevant. Challenges have included supporting students to adapt to a student-driven, deep learning approach.
conclusionsFirst-year students appear to have adopted a patient-centred outlook, the ability to integrate knowledge from across the curriculum, an appreciation for other team members and the self-efficacy to collaboratively tackle challenging, authentic clinical problems. Ultimately, CSI's innovative design is attractive and pertinent to the needs of modern medical students and ultimately, future doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.