Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35125033›Full record

ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2022

Unseen patterns of preventable emergency care: Emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.

Beth Parkinson, Rachel Meacock, Katherine Checkland, Matt Sutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating health systems through ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Acute care utilization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions among publicly insured children.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beth ParkinsonHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, 5292The University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4120-0933
Rachel MeacockHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, 5292The University of Manchester, UK.
Katherine ChecklandHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, 5292The University of Manchester, UK.
Matt SuttonHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, 5292The University of Manchester, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208183/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdmissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are often used to measure potentially preventable emergency care. Visits to emergency departments with ACSCs may also be preventable care but are excluded from such measures if patients are not admitted. We established the extent and composition of this preventable emergency care.

methodsWe analysed 1,505,979 emergency department visits (5% of the national total) between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2017 at six hospital Trusts in England, using International Classification of Diseases diagnostic coding. We calculated the number of visits for each ACSC and examined the proportions of these visits that did not result in admission by condition and patient characteristics.

results11.1% of emergency department visits were for ACSCs. 55.0% of these visits did not result in hospital admission. Whilst the majority of ACSC visits were for acute rather than chronic conditions (59.4% versus 38.4%), acute visits were much more likely to conclude without admission (70.3% versus 33.4%). Younger, more deprived and ethnic minority patients were less likely to be admitted when they visited the emergency department with an ACSC.

conclusionsOver half of preventable emergency care is not captured by measures of admissions. The probability of admission at a preventable visit varies substantially between conditions and patient groups. Focussing only on admissions for ACSCs provides an incomplete and skewed picture of the types of conditions and patients receiving preventable care. Measures of preventable emergency care should include visits in addition to admissions.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAmbulatory Care Sensitive ConditionsEmergency Service, HospitalEthnicityHospitalizationHumansMinority Groupsambulatory care sensitive conditionsinternational classification of diseases codingpreventable emergency care

Identifiers

PMID35125033
PMCPMC9277334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.