Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35124895›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2022

Nanopore 16S sequencing enhances the detection of bacterial meningitis after neurosurgery.

Yoonhyuk Jang, Seondeuk Kim, Narae Kim, Hyoshin Son, Eun Jin Ha, Eun Jung Koh, Ji Hoon Phi, Chul-Kee Park, Jeong Eun Kim, Seung-Ki Kim and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification ofJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Menace of Meningitis!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yoonhyuk Jang *Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Seondeuk Kim *Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Narae KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyoshin SonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6643-3712
Eun Jin HaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Jung KohDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-9546
Ji Hoon PhiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeong Eun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Ki KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang Kun LeeDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-0699
Won-Sang Cho *Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jangsup Moon *Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1282-4528
Kon Chu *Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5863-0302
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNosocomial bacterial meningitis is one of the major complications after neurosurgery. We performed nanopore 16S amplicon sequencing from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to evaluate bacterial meningitis in patients who underwent neurosurgery.

methodsAmong the patients who visited the neurosurgery department of Seoul National University Hospital between July 2017 and June 2020, those with clinically suspected bacterial meningitis were included. 16S rDNA PCR was performed from the CSF, and nanopore sequencing was performed for up to 3 h. The reads were aligned to the BLAST database. In each case, the culture and the 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis were simultaneously performed and compared with each other, and we retrospectively reviewed the medical records. Genuine infection was determined by the identical results between conventional culture study and the sequencing, or clinically determined in cases with inconsistent results between the two methods.

resultsOf the 285 samples obtained from 178 patients who had 16S rDNA PCR, 41 samples (14.4%) were diagnosed with genuine infection. A total of 56.1% (23/41) of the samples with genuine infection showed a false-negative culture test. In particular, 16S amplicon sequencing was useful in evaluating patients at the initial tests who had infection with intraventricular hemorrhage (Culture false-negative rate = 100%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (Culture false-negative rate = 77.8%), and systemic cancer (Culture false-negative rate = 100%), which are risk factors for central fever. Moreover, 16S amplicon sequencing could suggest the possibility of persistent bacterial meningitis in empirical antibiotic use.

conclusionCSF nanopore 16S sequencing was more effective than conventional CSF culture studies in postoperative bacterial meningitis and may contribute to evidence-based decisions for antibiotic maintenance and discontinuation.

Indexed as

Meningitis, BacterialNanoporesNeurosurgeryAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, RibosomalHumansRetrospective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35124895
PMCPMC8935320
OpenAlexW4210714145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.